Comments:

elgan - 2006-06-22 00:38:31
I don't think I want to get into a discussion on the social implications of fellatio versus cunnilingus (dictionary.com does have them). I think this is a matter between consenting adults, as are all sexual acts, and not the domain of male-bashing feminists. A woman should not have to give head if she doesn't want to, nor should a man have to go down on a woman if he does not desire it. It becomes demeaning if it is done without joy and love and a desire to please, but out of a sense of obligation or, worse, fear. A woman who dresses like a man (not one wearing masculine clothing that still show off her femininity) is called a dyke. What is so different about a man wearing women's garments? Yes, we live in a fucked up society. With that, I can definitely agree.
-------------------------------
radiogurl - 2006-06-22 13:42:02
From the perspective of a woman working in what's traditionally a man's world (last I heard the proportion of female managers in broadcasting was something like .045%) I can see both sides of the feminism issue. I agree with you that women shouldn't want their cake and eat it, too (so to speak) - but in my personal life, I am NOT the manager. I prefer a very traditional role at home. If I'd had the option I would have preferred to remain a stay-at-home mom. Unfortunately, that option was never open to me and so I had to be mom, dad, employee and everything else. As to the fellatio/cuninlingus debate, I consider it a horrible insult to think that any consensual sexual act is degrading. The only time it is a bad thing, imho, is if it is non-consensual, which applies to ANY act between ANY two or more individuals.
-------------------------------

add your comment:

back to the entry - Diaryland